显示标签为“debate”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“debate”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月15日星期五

House Passes Ryan Plan to help the debate on the Budget Guide U.S.

April 15, 2011, 4: 33 pm EDT by Brian Faler

(Updates with Schumer, Rehberg and Carney, comments from fifth paragraph).

April 15 (Bloomberg)--The U.S. House passed a Republican budget that would cut spending by more than 6 billion more than a decade and privatize Medicare vote the party line that will help define the fight on the deficit in next year's elections.Legislators approved proposal of the Chairman of the Budget Committee House Paul Ryan today on a vote of 235-193, a day after the recapitulation of the first battle of the budget for the year with passage of $ 38.5 billion spending for 2011 cut. "" Yesterday we cut billions, today cut us trillion, "said representative Kevin McCarthy of California, third rank Republican.The measurement of the House is certain to die in the Senate, where democratic leaders approved President Barack Obama concurrent call to reduce the deficit through a combination of increases in taxes and spending. "House Republicans have left Tea Party zeal to get the best of them, and this vote will reverberate for a long time, said Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat ranked third of his room. "In the coming months, we will miss not a unique opportunity to remind the public that the Republicans have voted end Medicare to provide additional tax cuts for millionaires."Vote BreakdownNo Democrats today voted for the Ryan plan while four Republicans opposed: representatives Denny Rehberg of Montana, David McKinley - West Virginia, Walter Jones of North Carolina and Ron Paul of Texas.Rehberg, which is next year running for the Senate, said: "there are still too many unanswered questions on the reform of health insurance, and I support everything simply any plan until I know for a fact that seniors in Montana will be protected."White House spokesman Jay Carney said "the President is in agreement with the Republicans in the House that we must reduce our deficit and put our country on a sound track on the financial plan, but we disagree with their approach."Carney also said "any solution will require Republicans and Democrats working together, and we are committed to this process."Proposal for CutsRyan expenditure relied exclusively on the spending cuts to reduce the deficit of the Government, slicing $ 6.2 billion over 10 years and dozens of other programs, including the Medicaid, Medicare and food stampsagricultural subsidies and grants for tuition for College Pell.Il calls to replace the traditional Medicare health care system for elderly people with subsidies to purchase private insurance starting with people who turn 65 in 2022. It would also cut the top corporate and individual tax from 35% to 25% rates. The plan would not balance the books of the Government until the 2040.Most Americans pay more for their health plan care, according to the Congressional Budget Office while States may have to cut Medicaid participantsthe program of the Federal State of health care which serves the poor.Representative Allen West, a freshman Republican from Florida, said it was ready to take the plan to his constituents. "I am not here to worry about being re-elected,"said West. "There is a disastrous situation" and "we explain to people, not stand up and demagogue, she and try just to scare people". "Definition time ' Representative Lou Barletta, a Pennsylvania Republican, called the vote a"decisive moment,"said" we do it even at the risk of our own future political - but we do for the next generation and this is what I came here to do. ".After the vote, the House will have to produce additional legislation to make specific taxes and political expenditure changes. This process could produce invoices to depart from the plan of Ryan, and some Republicans said that he allows them to support its budget even if they do not support its policy requirements.I think not necessarily that just by voting for the budget, you sign "" to its proposals, said Missouri Representative Jo Ann Emerson, co-Chair of a group of Republican moderates, known as the Tuesday Group."It has no control over what are committees, "she said." "You know what happens once the Committee process begins." It proves to be very different. "Framing DebateEach side seeks to frame the debate on the budget of Ryan on major topics. "It is important to define ourselves with our actions and show the country that we are serious to get the debt under control, Ryan said in an interview. "Sit and do nothing about it because of the policy would be a huge moral failure.".Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat in Connecticut, said the Republican budget "throws seniors for the wolves."Today's vote opens another series of battles so - called discretionary part of the budget - the control of legislators of areas through the annual appropriations bill. "Ryan plan calls for $ 31 billion in 2012 cuts, on top of $ 38.5 billion in savings approved yesterday after negotiations that led almost to a stop of Government".We will be through this battle even everywhere once again, "stated representative Scott Garrett, a Republican from New Jersey Budget Committee.Ryan said that the fact that his plan comes to a vote shows how" times have changed. "A plan similar budget by Ryan drew 14 sponsors last year when Democrats controlled the House. "Ryan credited his party's 87-Member Republican House freshman class, several elected by activists of the Tea Party for change".They brought a whole new perspective. They have much energy, a lot of resourcefulness, lots of backbone to the Congress, "said Ryan.

-With the help of Catherine Dodge and Laura Litvan in Washington. Editors: Don Frederick, Laurie Asseo

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Faler in Washington to bfaler@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva in msilva34@bloomberg.net


View the original article here

2011年4月9日星期六

The Libya debate would liven up "boring" election: Hillier

Former former Chief of staff of the defence of the Canada, said he is "surprised" by the lack of debate on the conflict in Libya during an election campaign "boring".

Rick Hillier, the former franc Chief of the Canadian military, said in an interview with the Radio of the CBC The Current it finds this mysterious that the role of the Canada in Libya is not under more scrutinyespecially when voters go to the polls on May 2.

Hillier said that he would like to see a debate over where the positions of the parties to the conflict in the Libya arrive on the campaign trail.

"I am intrigued by the absolute absence of any discussion of the operations in Libya by the United Nations and NATO for the United Nations, which is inclusive of the Canada," said Hillier.

"I am just absolutely mystified.". We are two weeks in an election campaign, it is the most boring thing that I've ever seen in my life and it would be one of the issues that could brighten it just a little bit. ?

The Canada hired six CF-18 to join an international effort to enforce a resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations that seeks to prevent violence by forces loyal to the Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi against rebels and civilians.

Hillier said the interview of the no-fly zone on the Libya is a measure of half and that it protects the people on the ground.

The retired General, said that there is very little clarity on the mission in Libya. Hillier said, in his view, history has shown that the missions of the air have never worked.

"You have always to have a combination of actions." "Therefore, if you cannot completely protect the people that you said that you want to protect - and there are also a few issues it - keeping the forces of Gaddafi from them, then the only alternative in my view is to delete Gaddafi" said hillier.

"And if you are not going to do and that you cannot protect the people that you said because it is still in power, then really, what you do?" It is half-measures and which causes me bothers when people die. ?

The retired General, said that the air mission could be an expensive proposition, in the long term for the international community.

He said Kadhafi best strategy can be simply wait on NATO forces.

The absence of parliamentary control over the mission in the long term of the Canada in Libya will contrast of role in Afghanistan, a mission which Hillier has led in his time: the Chief of staff of the defence of the country.

"He did not arrive during the election campaign whatsoever." "We are at war, we have done this in Afghanistan, we had huge discussion, huge amounts of discussion on the mission in Afghanistan, including parliamentary debates," Hillier said.

"Here in the Canada now it is really silent on what is happening in Libya and it's strange for me personally."

Accessibility links

View the original article here